home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 08:59:57 -0400
- Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9506030838.A7108-0100000@equinox.shaysnet.com>
- From: Richard Evans <devans@equinox.shaysnet.com>
- To: Multiple recipients of list <drctalk@drcnet.org>
- Subject: Rep. Solomon
-
- This is from the (new) July 1995 issue of REASON.
-
- The typos are mine.
-
- -- Dick
-
- =================================================
-
- SPEECH CODE
-
- A drug warrior tries to stifle critics of prohibition.
-
- by Rick Henderson
-
- In April, a powerful member of Congress introduced a bill that
- would punish the donors of organizations that advocate legalizing certain
- unlawful activities. In this instance, the targets aren't people who
- bankroll rural militias; instead the congressman wants to zero in on
- supporters of the Reason Foundation (publishers of REASON), the Cato
- Institute, the Drug Policy Foundation, and any other tax-exempt group
- that promotes drug legalization.
-
- On April 6, Rep. Gerald Solomon (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House
- Rules Committee, proposed HR 1453, a bill that would revoke the
- tax-exempt status of any organization "if any portion of the activities
- of such organization consists of promoting the legalization of any
- controlled substance." Solomon promised to attach his proposal as an
- amendment to some other bill that's likely to pass.
-
- In a vitriolic statement Solomon entered in the Congressional
- Record, he singled out "the libertarian elites at the Cato Institute," and
- the "deceptive, sinister, and seedy" Drug Policy Foundation as two
- examples of groups that have placed "the American family...under attack"
- by advocating an end to prohibition.
-
- Solomon would also move beyond revoking the tax-exempt status of
- organizations; he would instruct the Internal revenue Service to hunt
- down their donors. "These organizations and the individuals involved with
- them are violating United States Tax Code," he said. "They need to be
- investigated and their contributors should be required to pay taxes on
- past contributions." The bill would affect not only policy organizations
- but other non-profits, including, for instance, drug treatment clinics,
- universities, and religious groups.
-
- Phil Gutis, a spikesman for the American Civil Liberties Union,
- calls Solomon's bill "patently unconstitutional. The [Supreme] Court has
- been very clear that you can't punish individuals or organizations for
- what they advocate...The only goal of this bill is to prevent advocacy."
-
- Gutis says conservative drug warriors like Solomon should be
- careful before they push new restrictions on advocacy. A legislative
- mechanism that lets the feds punish advocates of drug legalization
- today, he says, couyld later be used to punish persons "because they
- belong to the [National Rifle Association] or subscribe to Soldier of
- Fortune."
- ###
-
-
-
-